History of Harmful Myths
Historic Hate Tropes, How They Began and Reappear
Blood libel, hidden-control myths, dual-loyalty accusations, and claims about Jewish money have shifted across centuries. This guide traces the core ideas and shows how they return in modern politics and media.
This guide and all 18 others in one free PDF, plus new guides by email.
- Founded in 1977
- Global advocacy, education, and research
- Teaching the lessons of the Holocaust
What is an antisemitic trope?
An antisemitic trope is a recurring false idea about Jews. It may cast a diverse population as secretly powerful, disloyal, greedy, manipulative, or responsible for whatever crisis is unfolding.
The details change from one era to another, but the structure remains. Once you recognize that structure, a modern version is easier to spot even before anyone names it.
What is blood libel? Meaning and origin
Blood libel is the false accusation that Jews murder Christians, usually children, to use their blood in religious rituals. It has no basis in Jewish law or practice, which forbids murder and prohibits consuming blood of any kind.
The accusation first appeared in Norwich, England, after a boy named William was found dead in 1144. A monk, Thomas of Monmouth, later wrote the account that turned his death into a ritual murder story. Similar charges followed across Europe, including Lincoln in 1255 and Trent in 1475, and they were used to justify torture, executions and massacres.
Authorities sometimes rejected the charge. Pope Innocent IV condemned it in 1247, and the Catholic Church suppressed the cult of Simon of Trent in 1965. The accusation kept returning anyway.
Get the next guide by email
Free learning guides and research from the Simon Wiesenthal Center, sent to your inbox.
You are subscribed. Thank you.
Blood libel in the modern era
The accusation did not end with the Middle Ages. It resurfaced in documented cases and propaganda well into the twentieth century.
Today the same structure appears online in conspiracy theories that accuse Jews, or elites described in coded terms, of secretly harming children. The names and settings are new; the accusation is the old one.
- 1840, Damascus: Jews are arrested and tortured after a friar disappears, drawing international protest
- 1913, Kyiv: Menahem Mendel Beilis is tried for ritual murder and acquitted
- 1934, Germany: the Nazi paper Der Stürmer devotes a special issue to the charge
- 1946, Kielce, Poland: a false kidnapping story sets off a pogrom that kills 42 Jews
Why have Jews been targeted throughout history?
The explanation lies with the people and systems that spread hostility, not with Jews. Historians trace several overlapping sources that built on one another over time.
Each layer kept the earlier ones and added a new justification. That is why the same accusation can be framed as religion in one century, economics in the next, and politics today.
- Religious anti-Judaism: the charge that Jews collectively killed Jesus, formally rejected by the Catholic Church in 1965
- Legal exclusion: bans on land ownership and most trades, followed by blame for the roles that remained open
- Scapegoating in crisis: accusations of poisoning wells during the Black Death of 1348 to 1351
- Racial antisemitism: the nineteenth century recast old hostility as biology, and the word antisemitism spread from 1879
- Conspiracy myths: the forged Protocols of the Elders of Zion, first published in Russia in 1903
Hidden control and money
Restrictions that barred Jews from most occupations while permitting moneylending created an association that was then treated as an innate trait rather than as the product of the restriction.
The modern form drops the medieval detail but keeps the charge: finance, media, or government are supposedly directed by a small group whose influence is never actually documented.
Dual loyalty and collective blame
The dual loyalty charge holds that Jewish citizens serve a foreign interest rather than their own country. It has been leveled by governments across the political spectrum for well over a century.
Collective blame is its companion. It treats any Jewish person as answerable for the actions of a state, an individual, or an institution they had no part in.
The structures underneath the variations
Most versions reduce to a few recurring structures. Learning those structures lasts longer than memorizing examples, because the examples keep changing while the underlying claims do not.
- Secret coordinated power
- Hidden financial control
- Divided loyalty
- Blame for social crisis
- Harm concealed from view
How an old claim is modernized
Updating a trope takes little work. The underlying claim stays in place while the vocabulary changes, making an inherited accusation sound like commentary on a current event.
- Use a coded noun
- Tie to current events
- Frame as a question
- Cite a false source
- Add ironic distance
Why the same shape keeps returning
These claims persist because they are useful to the people spreading them. They turn complicated failures into one simple story and provide a group to blame.
That usefulness helps explain why they return during economic upheaval, war, and epidemics. They arrive ready-made because the basic story has already been told for generations.
Criticism, stereotype, and the line between
Criticizing a government, policy, or individual is ordinary political argument. The line is crossed when the criticism falls back on hidden coordination, collective blame, or another inherited structure.
Ask what claim is actually being made and whether the same standard would apply to anyone else in that position. The answer usually clarifies the line.
Common Questions
- Is criticism of a Jewish person automatically antisemitic?
- No. Criticism of conduct is ordinary. It becomes a trope when it invokes hidden coordination, collective responsibility, or explanations reserved for Jews alone.
- Why are the Rothschilds used in conspiracies?
- The family is a convenient stand-in for a much older claim about concealed financial control, allowing the medieval structure to be repeated with a real name attached.
- What is blood libel?
- The medieval false accusation that Jews murdered Christian children for ritual use. It was untrue in every case and repeatedly used to justify violence.
- Why do these claims surge during a crisis?
- They offer a simple explanation and an identifiable target when events feel uncontrollable, so they resurface during economic disruption, war, and epidemics.
- How can a modern version be identified?
- By looking past the vocabulary to the structure. Hidden coordination, financial control, divided loyalty, and collective blame recur regardless of the current wording.
- Where did blood libel start?
- In Norwich, England, in 1144, when a monk's account turned a boy's death into a ritual murder story. The charge then spread across Europe.
- Was blood libel ever proven?
- No. Every case was fabricated, and Jewish law forbids both murder and consuming blood.
- How did antisemitism start?
- Hostility toward Jews is far older than the word. Religious anti-Judaism took hold in late antiquity and the Middle Ages, and the term antisemitism was popularized in Germany in 1879 to present the same hostility as racial science.
Teaching the pattern, not only the latest example
SWC traces these claims across time so people can recognize a familiar structure even when it arrives in language that sounds completely current.
Answering one incident at a time means starting over with each new example. The underlying pattern is worth teaching because it is the part that keeps returning.
What subscribers receive
Old accusations return in new language. Subscribers learn the underlying pattern so they can recognize it in any form.
- Trope histories Learn where recurring myths began.
- Modern examples See how old accusations are repackaged.
- Education tools Teach conspiracy literacy responsibly.
Get History and Media Updates
Follow SWC research on recurring conspiracy myths.
Receive Educational Resources